View Single Post
Old 03-26-2014, 11:37 AM   #14
fjtorres
Grand Sorcerer
fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 11,732
Karma: 128354696
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 26 kly from Sgr A*
Device: T100TA,PW2,PRS-T1,KT,FireHD 8.9,K2, PB360,BeBook One,Axim51v,TC1000
Quote:
Originally Posted by wizwor View Post
The Netflix agreement provides a speedier onramp for a fee and Apple is interested in having a protected 'flow' for its traffic. Do you doubt that Comcast uses QoS to ensure high quality television and voice calls? The unprioritized traffic is everything else.

I think the analogy stands up.
Before Netflix signed the deal with Comcast, they were routinely throttling their streams forcing quality down. Many (most?) cableco ISPs do it, too.

A google search for Comcast throttling will find hundres of reports. Comcast was also called on the carpet by the FCC for selective throttling of streaming applications.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bandwidth_throttling

If you pay for a specific bandwidth level but can't use all of it because of throttling, you are effectively paying a higher rate for the service you do receive which is the same thing as a tax. And a non-trivial one at that.
fjtorres is offline   Reply With Quote