View Single Post
Old 03-25-2014, 05:30 AM   #416
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,557
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbjb View Post
The double-slit does indeed show the things you say, but in addition to that it does show the effect of the observer on wave function collapse - if the experimenter adds a detector to determine which slit a given particle goes through, the interference pattern disappears (indicating, per the Copenhagen interpretation, wave function collapse).

/JB
But again, it's interaction with the detector that causes the wave function to collapse, not the presence of the observer. The wave function will collapse regardless of the presence of the observer; all that's required is the presence of the detector.
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote