View Single Post
Old 03-25-2014, 05:03 AM   #412
jbjb
Somewhat clueless
jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 780
Karma: 10535853
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rizla View Post
I didn't know that. I thought the role of consciousness in the double-slit experiment was inescapable.
The double slit experiment highlights the role of the "observer" in quantum mechanics, but doesn't necessarily require consciousness on the part of the observer. There is an interpretation which does postulate that (the Von Neumann–Wigner interpretation), but it's very much a minority position. A more widely held view is that a conscious observer is not required.

For example, from Heisenberg's "Physics and Philosophy":

"The observer has, rather, only the function of registering decisions, i.e., processes in space and time, and it does not matter whether the observer is an apparatus or a human being;".

/JB
jbjb is offline   Reply With Quote