View Single Post
Old 03-13-2014, 10:17 AM   #33
missimpossible
Groupie
missimpossible ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.missimpossible ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.missimpossible ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.missimpossible ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.missimpossible ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.missimpossible ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.missimpossible ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.missimpossible ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.missimpossible ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.missimpossible ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.missimpossible ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
missimpossible's Avatar
 
Posts: 165
Karma: 491236
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Glasgow
Device: Libra 2, Clara 2e, Oasis 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by DiapDealer View Post
Why do so many people say "pure entertainment" as if it's a negative thing?
Sorry if that was how my post came across - I really didn't mean it like that! I genuinely just meant that I think that a lot of YA falls into that category, not that a "pure entertainment" category is a bad thing. I read a lot of stuff purely for the sake of entertainment because that's what I want to do and because I read a lot of boring legal stuff for uni. What I meant was that I think that some people do see that as a criticism and go to lengths to prove that YA books are "more" than that whereas I don't see why they need to be. There's a place for everything. However, I do think there's a difference between books that fall purely into the entertainment category and stuff that is a bit more "literary" for want of a better word. I just think they're for different things and that's not a criticism of one or the other.
missimpossible is offline   Reply With Quote