Quote:
Originally Posted by Anak
Yes, I'm aware and have seen different browser engines handle web pages differently. I just wanted to state that Kobo should use only one renderer (I guess Kobo would choose Access; lower costs/fees or easier to build/adapt or any other reason etc.) that works with both epub flavours and different DRM schemes. Using only one renderer will build pages near 100% identical.
I do use Datalogics DL Reader as it is a lot faster as ADE.
|
I don't know what Adobe/Datalogics would charge for using ADEPT DRM outside of Adobe's software framework but I suspect it would be little if any cheaper and would likely be a pain to implement -- dev hours are not free.
My opinion is that if Kobo had to choose one renderer, at this point in time, Kobo would have to go with ACCESS -- one look at how an epub2 renderer handles Japanese typography gives you all the information you need to make that decision.
Regards,
David