View Single Post
Old 03-12-2014, 04:56 PM   #290
jandrew
Zealot
jandrew ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jandrew ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jandrew ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jandrew ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jandrew ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jandrew ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jandrew ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jandrew ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jandrew ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jandrew ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jandrew ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
jandrew's Avatar
 
Posts: 129
Karma: 2934438
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Winnipeg MB Canada
Device: aura hd
Quote:
Originally Posted by Catlady View Post
No, I am not. However, building blocks are building blocks, no matter what they're used to construct.



And I did not claim they did. But whether one has properly used its or it's, for example, can be determined objectively.
But what point are you trying to make by bringing up the objective determination of correct spelling and grammar in the context of authorship?

I mean, if only error-free books (in terms of spelling, grammar, and punctuation) were published, what would be different (besides libraries being vastly smaller)? We could still have some number of error-free books by traditional publishers, vanity publishers, and self-publishers. And, we could still have no guarantee that any given error-free book was worth reading. And, we could still be sitting here reading a thread entitled "Just because you have written an error-free book does not make you an author" for that matter.
jandrew is offline   Reply With Quote