View Single Post
Old 02-28-2014, 01:00 PM   #32
Sil_liS
Wizard
Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 4,896
Karma: 33602910
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: PocketBook 903 & 360+
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barcey View Post
A defense lawyer is always going to claim that their client did nothing wrong, it doesn't matter how knowledgable they are in antitrust laws or how guilty they believe their clients are. An antitrust compliance lawyer has a goal of keeping the company compliant (and would have been fired the first time they told Steve Jobs he couldn't do that).
Actually lawyers advise their clients to plead guilty when this would get them a lower sentence, and since Apple acknowledging wrong doing in this case would have meant no monitor I don't see why they haven't gone with this option.
Sil_liS is offline   Reply With Quote