Quote:
Originally Posted by Barcey
There are defense lawyers and antitrust lawyers. If a company is serious about obeying the antitrust laws they would have a lawyer that specializes in antitrust and is accountable for them not running foul of the laws. The company is supposed to have these processes and checks in place and Apple obviously doesn't and that's why the monitor was put in place. Apple is to implement a minimal compliance process and the judge didn't believe they could be trusted to do so on their own. The appeals just prove she was correct. Apple obviously wants to continue negotiating deals that run afoul of the laws.
|
Wouldn't defense lawyers in antitrust cases also be antitrust lawyers?