View Single Post
Old 02-26-2014, 05:20 PM   #20
crich70
Grand Sorcerer
crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
crich70's Avatar
 
Posts: 11,310
Karma: 43993832
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Monroe Wisconsin
Device: K3, Kindle Paperwhite, Calibre, and Mobipocket for Pc (netbook)
No doubt some of the contemporaries of Charles Dickens felt the same way about how well he was doing compared to their own books. And I wager some probably were jealous of Issac Asimov's diversity of writing as well. What makes this different though is that they didn't throw a pity party in front of millions like this author seems to be from the quoted passages. It sounds like the 'Oh woe is me (author's name) is writing more or better than I can at the moment and denying me my dues,' sort of rant. A lot of books (from what I understand) were written because someone read another author's book and thought "I can do better than that." But instead of doing that this author threw a pity party. I wager it does more harm than good to their own career as an author. People can have a long memory about other people who act out like this. Especially when it's on the net where anything that goes up can never really be taken down. The original poster may delete it but you can bet it will be archived somewhere by someone.
crich70 is offline   Reply With Quote