|
Not exactly the same arguments in the trial. The four appeal points are
That Judge Cote erred in
1) saying that Apple's negotiation was in violation of the Sherman anti-trust act
2) That Apple was per se liable.
3) excluding Coe's testimony when there was no evidence to the contrary.
4) the injunction exceeded her authority.
I think that 2) is the biggie, that's where Judge Cote deviated the most from the current case law and where I think that the case is most likely to be overturned.
|