View Single Post
Old 02-26-2014, 07:34 AM   #499
joblack
Wizard
joblack ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.joblack ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.joblack ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.joblack ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.joblack ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.joblack ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.joblack ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.joblack ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.joblack ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.joblack ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.joblack ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,753
Karma: 4382688
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Somewhere on earth
Device: Onyx Boox Tab X C
Quote:
Originally Posted by ManDay View Post
When I said $80 I's thinking of the material cost (and manufacturing), exclusively. Of course you can't get any such screen for $80 from those who sell them. My point being that most of the cost is in the development value - not the material. And by amputating the software in the manner that Sony did, the development value becomes all worthless.
Exactly, the material cost for computer processors are very low but the 'creation costs' are huge.
joblack is offline   Reply With Quote