View Single Post
Old 02-24-2014, 08:12 AM   #51
knc1
Going Viral
knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
knc1's Avatar
 
Posts: 17,212
Karma: 18210809
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Central Texas
Device: No K1, PW2, KV, KOA
Quote:
Originally Posted by NiLuJe View Post
@dsmid: Yep, the recovery v2 format includes the target OTA version in the header, and the header is part of the stuff that's signed.
Ah, but what about the information installed on the machine which is being compared against,
is it also signed?

Note: This question refers back to a suggestion of mine when this situation (or a similar one) came up - of lying to the OTA updater about the currently installed version.
knc1 is offline   Reply With Quote