Quote:
Originally Posted by Shane R
I disagree.
But everyone will be examining his conduct going forward now that this court has ruled the way they did, so maybe we'll get some clarity on it that way.
|
And the court ruled that:
Quote:
|
As the government explaned at oral argument, the injunction "ensur[es] not just that [Apple] ha[s] an anti-trust compliance program in place but [that Apple's] employess particularly, senior executives and board members are being instructed on what those compliance policies mean and how they work" The government conceded that the injunction would not allow the monitor to investigate whether such personnel were in fact complying with the antitrust or other laws.
|
The judge made it clear, the monitor did as instructed, and the Second Court of Appeals reiterated that Apple employees that have to be instructed are particularly senior executives and board members.
What exactly do you disagree with?