View Single Post
Old 02-13-2014, 05:37 PM   #45
SteveEisenberg
Grand Sorcerer
SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,438
Karma: 43514536
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: near Philadelphia USA
Device: Kindle Kids Edition, Fire HD 10 (11th generation)
Quote:
Originally Posted by fjtorres View Post
Well, agents reject 90% of submissions.
It is all about numbers.

I gather from the OP article that the greater the number (starting from the most popular) of books drawn into the sample, the worse for indies, and the better for commercially published.

I agree with Howey that taking every book on Amazon.com into the sample would be unfair to the indie world. But the number of titles he picks (the top-selling 7,000 for some analyses, top 50,000 for others) is necessarily arbitrary. And note why it would be unfair to compare the income from the average indie book with that from the average big publisher book. It's because commercial and university publishers do actually publish better-than-average books.

Howey's argument that going indie maximizes genre authors income isn't bulletproof, but he does present real evidence. But from a reader standpoint, he didn't help the indie cause.
SteveEisenberg is offline   Reply With Quote