Quote:
Originally Posted by Shane R
It's self-explanatory?
The directors, the officers, and "each of Apple's employees engaged, in whole or in part, in activities relating to Apple's iBookstore."
http://www.justice.gov/atr/cases/f300500/300510.pdf
The core part of the monitors job, with reference to the people above is below. |
It is self-explanatory, which is why it is clear that the interviews that Bromwich requested were within the narrow scope of the judge's decision. So your earlier post when you said:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shane R
What Judge Cote wrote in her judgement against Apple and what she instructed the monitor to do were at odds.
|
makes no sense. The instructions were clear from the beginning, were in perfect agreement with the decision, and were followed correctly by the monitor.