Quote:
Originally Posted by Sil_liS
the result of the appeal makes it clear that this is what the monitor was supposed to do.
|
Apple is supposed to put good training in place, the monitor is supposed to make sure good training is in place.
Quote:
|
I am giving the monitor a somewhat different function than that proposed by the plaintiffs. The monitor will not be charged with assessing Apple’s compliance generally with the terms of the final judgment. This could be a very expensive and intrusive undertaking. The monitor, however will have two other important tasks . . . .The monitor will evaluate Apple’s internal antitrust compliance policies . . . [and] will evaluate Apple’s antitrust training program.
|
Quote:
|
Under the terms of the Injunction, the Monitor has two main tasks. Reviewing and producing recommendations and reports about: 1) Apple’s antitrust compliance policies and procedures; and 2) Apple’s antitrust training program. The Injunction provided that the Monitor would submit a written report to Apple, the plaintiffs, and the Court 180 days after the Monitor’s appointment assessing Apple’s antitrust compliance policies, procedures and training.
|
http://sdnyblog.com/wp-content/uploa...st-Monitor.pdf