Quote:
Originally Posted by pwalker8
I've already linked to the court document where Bromwich asserts that he can talk to anyone at Apple about anything he wishes.
|
Please could you highlight that post? I've had a dig through your posts on this thread and can't find it - though I've only looked at the ones that seemed relevant to Bromwich.
I thought we were referring here to the document that Bromwich provided in response for this appeal court hearing, which can be read here (the middle one of the three documents presented):
http://allthingsd.com/20131129/apple...-70000-a-week/
In it, Bromwich states very clearly:
Quote:
|
I advised [Apple] that I felt it was important to conduct a set of initial meetings and interviews with company executives and members of the Board to introduce myself, lay the foundations for our relationship, and learn some basic facts about the company's compliance framework.
|
These are the meetings that were turned down, and were clearly well within the remit of the Court's Final Judgement. I can't see anywhere in Bromwich's letter where he asserts that he has the authority to investigate 'anything he wishes', or indeed any matters outside of dealing with compliance or compliance training schemes.
Graham