View Single Post
Old 02-11-2014, 12:56 PM   #371
PatNY
Zennist
PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
PatNY's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,022
Karma: 47809468
Join Date: Jul 2010
Device: iPod Touch, Sony PRS-350, Nook HD+ & HD
The appellate court did not change any of the parameters for Bromwich which did not exist beforehand as expressed in Cote's prior orders. The leash he is on now existed prior to this ruling.

If Bromwich feels Ive or Gore is relevant to his monitoring, he can still go ahead and interview them. The court did not exempt board directors, and in fact mentioned them as fair game for interviews.

--Pat
PatNY is offline   Reply With Quote