Quote:
Originally Posted by Prestidigitweeze
The thing I've enjoyed about this discussion is that, despite the charged nature of the subject and the parties involved, the debate on both sides has mostly been about the trial and not the unstated tactics or motives of other members or their supposed allegiances.
You're close to exhausting the subject at this point and it's understandable that participants' interest is beginning to wane. Still, I hope the thread will go out as it came in -- discussing the ramifications and intricacies of the decision -- and not degenerate into mutual accusations.
[Moderator: I didn't see your warning until after I'd written my comments. Please feel free to delete this post if you like.]
|
There really isn't going to be much to talk about until the appeals court decides on the emergency stay. I will say though that the $840 M damage claim filed on Friday simply solidifies my belief that this one is all about a legal raid on a company known to have lots of cash, the primary reason that I've been following the case.