View Single Post
Old 02-01-2014, 08:43 PM   #83
eschwartz
Ex-Helpdesk Junkie
eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
eschwartz's Avatar
 
Posts: 19,421
Karma: 85400180
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Beaten Path, USA, Roundworld, This Side of Infinity
Device: Kindle Touch fw5.3.7 (Wifi only)
Quote:
Originally Posted by crich70 View Post
Some may think it's silly if they can afford the higher price or if they don't want AP but it does seem as if the poor guys get priced out of being able to afford things sometimes. That was the point I was trying to make. And I couldn't think of a better term than discrimination (based on economics) to fit the situation. After all there may be some who can afford it (barely) at $79.00 who will find it impossible to do so at $100.00 +. I've never been able to afford it (though it looks interesting) even at the current price so I know I won't be able to do so if they raise it up either.
That's not an Amazon thing, that's a business thing. As has already been said, it is pretty much the definition of poor: that you can't afford things. It is hardly within the scope of a business to provide things to people who can't afford it, that is what we call welfare.
eschwartz is offline   Reply With Quote