View Single Post
Old 01-30-2014, 10:22 AM   #342
PatNY
Zennist
PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
PatNY's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,022
Karma: 47809468
Join Date: Jul 2010
Device: iPod Touch, Sony PRS-350, Nook HD+ & HD
Quote:
Originally Posted by pwalker8 View Post
I see nothing in there that says what you claim. Perhaps you can cut and paste the part the supports your claim since I can't find it.

Once again in nice big letters I AM NOT CLAIMING THAT AMAZON VIOLATED ANTI-TRUST LAWS. Is this clear enough?
As I said in my post, it's on page 17. Did you even read that page?

I NEVER claimed you claimed Amazon violated anti-trust laws. Is that clear enough? I said you are trying to put Amazon on trial (metaphorically speaking, of course). But bottom line is that Amazon is not the issue here. Apple's behavior is. Nice try at diversion.

--Pat
PatNY is offline   Reply With Quote