Quote:
Originally Posted by Yapyap
It seems to me that a racial slur is a racial slur.
A separate issue is whether a given racial slur is "appropriate" in the context. In an ideal world, it never would be, but I can certainly see that for authors striving for realistic characters, depicting certain attitudes or using certain slurs would be appropriate in specific contexts (e.g. historical, sometimes - you likely wouldn't get a whole lot of characters in fiction set in theoa late 19th or early 20th century talk about African-Americans, for instance, but they'd use other words which are commonly considered offensive slurs now - even if they were relatively enlightened characters and not horrible bigots) or for specific characters in certain situations.
It's how those things are used that makes a difference, and I'd think a modern author needs to be very careful in choosing how to use them or which characters they're used by. It might be realistic for a character - it might even be realistic for the "hero" - but it's still a slur, and if it's obvious the "hero" thinks nothing of it, and is to be seen as a generally good person, then there will be readers who will naturally feel uncomfortable with this and may prefer to avoid the author's future work.
|
War is about doing things that one would not do nominally and are often very unpleasant. Using for example the term "Ragheads" is very much in context in a book about soldiers in battle or war.
Quote:
It is well that war is so terrible, otherwise we should grow too fond of it.
Robert E. Lee
Comment to James Longstreet, on seeing a Federal charge repulsed in the Battle of Fredericksburg (13 December 1862)
|
bernie