[pwalker8]

Originally Posted by Robotech_Master

Here's one antitrust law expert (I googled him, he appears to have reasonable credentials.) He seems to be arguing against the facts as stated in the case, calling the evidence weak and circumstantial.

True, but while it's possible that Apple may try to appeal based on finding of facts (and they will most certainly mention the thinness of the facts that she bases her thesis on), that's a real difficult row to hoe depending on which judges are on the panel. As I said earlier, there are actually quite a few interesting legal opinions out there about the case, you just have to weed through a lot of bashers and fan boys to find the ones that actually discuss the legal issues.