Thread: Onyx Boox R65 & C65
View Single Post
Old 01-21-2014, 06:10 AM   #78
fraylocus
Groupie
fraylocus knows the difference between 'who' and 'whom'fraylocus knows the difference between 'who' and 'whom'fraylocus knows the difference between 'who' and 'whom'fraylocus knows the difference between 'who' and 'whom'fraylocus knows the difference between 'who' and 'whom'fraylocus knows the difference between 'who' and 'whom'fraylocus knows the difference between 'who' and 'whom'fraylocus knows the difference between 'who' and 'whom'fraylocus knows the difference between 'who' and 'whom'fraylocus knows the difference between 'who' and 'whom'fraylocus knows the difference between 'who' and 'whom'
 
fraylocus's Avatar
 
Posts: 164
Karma: 10020
Join Date: Mar 2012
Device: Onyx Boox M92, Onyx Boox T68
Quote:
Originally Posted by szlevi View Post
Hello!

I tested Onyx Boox C65HD After Glow today in a store. (I'm just an everyday user, not more). It was disappointing for me.
The contrast of the screen was much worse than the one which i62HD (not Firefly, which I have not seen) has, which I've owned for a year.
Google Play is not supported, so you have to "sideload" .apk format software.
You can't switch between refresh modes. There's a default setting.
So I won't buy that.
The screen problem might be because of the light layer. (I'm not an expert.) There's a version of the device which does not contain frontlight. That may be better. (It's not sold in my country.)
Greetings,
Szlevi
I also testee one unit Tagus Lux Spanish distributor and indeed, apart from the poor quality of the front lighting, light greatly reduces the native contrast of the screen.
Another problem is the high intensity of illumination, even adjusting at least bothers reading.

To which we must add that the response of the touch screen is quite poor, worse than Firefly IR.

Greetings
fraylocus is offline   Reply With Quote