Quote:
Originally Posted by bgalbrecht
I read somewhere that perhaps the real reason why Apple is contesting Bromwich's activities is a ploy to get Cote to recuse herself from the rest of the cases around this, as she is the judge for several more cases concerning this still on the docket, including some class action lawsuits.
I personally consider Apple's complaining about the court ordered monitor (to which they originally agreed) a bit like someone complaining about their parole officer being too nosy.
|
And I read somewhere that Cote and Bromwich are long time friends (since the mid 80's) and that Cote wrote Bromwich a nice letter of recommendation to get him a job with the Government. The difference is that Cote's letter of recommendation for Bromwich in 1994 is recorded in the Senate hearings for Bromwich's confirmation, (
http://www.archive.org/stream/confir...3unit_djvu.txt ) while you are discussing internet speculation.