|
I read somewhere that perhaps the real reason why Apple is contesting Bromwich's activities is a ploy to get Cote to recuse herself from the rest of the cases around this, as she is the judge for several more cases concerning this still on the docket, including some class action lawsuits.
I personally consider Apple's complaining about the court ordered monitor (to which they originally agreed) a bit like someone complaining about their parole officer being too nosy.
|