Quote:
Originally Posted by DiapDealer
To be honest... I don't think Apple's current "resistance to punishment" strategies have anything to do with the monitor or Judge Cote. They know the court's decision is unassailable. They know they illegally conspired. They're just pushing an agenda that would exempt future corporate behavior from any government oversight whatsoever. They lost this game... so they're looking to change the rules of future games.
|
I'm not sure I understand your logic. I would think that if Apple thought that they were doing something illegal that they would have settled just like the publishers. The monetary amount would have been coming out of petty cash and they wouldn't have had to admit wrong doing.
Most corporations have little to no government oversight. That occurs only in the regulated industries such as banking and utilities. I can't think of a reason why Apple, which had no government oversight, would play such a game.