View Single Post
Old 01-17-2014, 08:14 AM   #13
kovidgoyal
creator of calibre
kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
kovidgoyal's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,461
Karma: 27757440
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Mumbai, India
Device: Various
The W3C also says:

"DOCTYPEs are required for legacy reasons. When omitted, browsers tend to use a different rendering mode that is incompatible with some specifications. Including the DOCTYPE in a document ensures that the browser makes a best-effort attempt at following the relevant specifications."

Since no ebook reading software I know of requires or uses a DOCTYPE for anything at all, I'd go with the WHATWG on this one.

Not to mention that the DOCTYPE the W3C reuires is <!DOCTYPE html> not the XHTML doctypes.

In any case, I am done trying to convince people, IMO DOCTYPEs are obsolete. You are welcome to reach that conclusion at your own pace
kovidgoyal is offline   Reply With Quote