View Single Post
Old 01-16-2014, 11:55 AM   #15
Rbneader
Fanatic
Rbneader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rbneader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rbneader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rbneader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rbneader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rbneader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rbneader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rbneader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rbneader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rbneader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rbneader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 503
Karma: 2661351
Join Date: Mar 2012
Device: None
Quote:
Originally Posted by drjenkins View Post
That would open "opportunities" for consultants to game the publishing system the way they try to skew Google search rankings today.
That wouldn't be ideal, but I'm not going to be upset if more authors start writing more effectively. The tool so far seems to confirm one principle of good writing, and a way to get concrete feedback on that might not be a bad thing. Since this is a university program, I'd expect it to go open-source at some point and then it's free for everyone to use.
Rbneader is offline   Reply With Quote