View Single Post
Old 01-14-2014, 08:07 PM   #163
pwalker8
Grand Sorcerer
pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,196
Karma: 70314280
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Device: iPad Pro, iPad mini, Kobo Aura, Amazon paperwhite, Sony PRS-T2
Quote:
Originally Posted by fjtorres View Post
To the surprise of only one person on the planet, Apple's foot-dragging motion was denied:
http://mobile.reuters.com/article/id...40113?irpc=932
I doubt that you could find one person on the planet who actually expected Judge Cote to grant a stay. It simply isn't her reputation. What will be interesting to watch is to see if the appeal of the stay is granted by the court of appeals. My understanding is that granting a stay requires either they show that damage will occur if the stay is not granted (that one seems pretty obvious unless Apple can get their money back if they win the appeal), or that there is a likelihood that the appeal will succeed (it can also be granted if it is shown that a third party will be damaged or for the public good, but I don't think either apply here). My understanding is that they look at it on a sliding scale.
pwalker8 is offline   Reply With Quote