View Single Post
Old 01-12-2014, 08:05 PM   #82
eschwartz
Ex-Helpdesk Junkie
eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
eschwartz's Avatar
 
Posts: 19,421
Karma: 85400180
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Beaten Path, USA, Roundworld, This Side of Infinity
Device: Kindle Touch fw5.3.7 (Wifi only)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lemurion View Post
It's efficient in terms of transmitting information: it makes it clear that this paragraph does not follow directly on from the preceding paragraph.
That may be so, yet how is it MORE efficient than asterisks?
Quote:


The advantage is that it renders the picture/asterisks unnecessary. Every scene needs a first paragraph, it doesn't need pictures or asterisks to indicate scene breaks. You convey the same information without adding additional design elements (which would be something else that Smashwords/Amazon/Whoever could potentially screw up).

It's the simplest option in terms of using the fewest design elements.
And asterisks render non-indents unnecessary.


Add in an extra paragraph -- are there too many design elements now?
What about when I use .scenebreak {text-align: center; margin:1em 0}? Is that more or less design elements than .noind {text-indent:0}?
eschwartz is offline   Reply With Quote