Thread: SF/Fantasy Poll
View Single Post
Old 10-20-2008, 10:12 AM   #109
DMcCunney
New York Editor
DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DMcCunney's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,384
Karma: 16540415
Join Date: Aug 2007
Device: PalmTX, Pocket eDGe, Alcatel Fierce 4, RCA Viking Pro 10, Nexus 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by nekokami View Post
Perhaps one thing we are talking about is "plausibility" again. But I think we're also talking about depth of story. Giant robots are not especially plausible (why would anyone try to make a mechanical fighting vehicle with such an impractical form?) but Neon Genesis Evangelion makes up for it (IMHO) with depth of characterization and exploration of psychological issues.
I can make suggestions as to why anyone would make a fighting vehicle with that form, but they have nothing to do with practicality, and everything to do with compensation on the part of the designer...

I got a laugh out of William Keith at a convention a few years back when I complimented him for almost making the the giant fighting robot plausible in his "Warstrider" series. He made them reasonably plausible in his setting, which was neat work, because I normally think of such things as simply large targets.
______
Dennis
DMcCunney is offline   Reply With Quote