Thread: "Why Chromebook Pundits Are Out of Touch"
View Single Post
Old 01-10-2014, 03:23 PM   #488
bill_mchale
Wizard
bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,451
Karma: 1550000
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Maryland, USA
Device: Nook Simple Touch, HPC Evo 4G LTE
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndrewH View Post
Interesting article about Micro$oft's anti-Chromebook ads:
Why Microsoft’s Scroogled Ads Are Wrong About Chromebooks
Yeah, the basic issue here is management of expectations. In original conception, chromebooks are essentially thin clients and that was what they were when first produced, but Google quickly added offline functionality that has allowed them to transcend that niche. Other than printing, they will cover almost all the things 80% of people use their computers for. They arguably are the perfect second or third computer for a family (at least one that doesn't do high end gaming on their computers ).

--
Bill
bill_mchale is offline   Reply With Quote