View Single Post
Old 10-19-2008, 05:40 PM   #309
tompe
Grand Sorcerer
tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,452
Karma: 7185064
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Linköpng, Sweden
Device: Kindle Voyage, Nexus 5, Kindle PW
Quote:
Originally Posted by bbusybookworm View Post
It refers to an inherent defect in the device, not broken parts. While it could be argued that the product itself was defective if the screen broke, you're going to have a hard time convincing them without spending a lot of money on lawyers and a very slim chance of success.
What is an inherent defect? If an electronic component breaks inside 2 years it is pretty clear that it is an inherent defect. And that was also the intention of the law.
tompe is offline   Reply With Quote