Quote:
Originally Posted by Xanthe
No. I'm just playing devil's advocate here. I don't have a dog in this fight because I've never read any of her books.
But I think if Rowling was really "hurt" by the revelation, she would have pushed for a stronger penalty - and it would have happened - and would have terminated her relationship with the law firm. His rebuke is ultimately meaningless because it is toothless, and because if she was willing to stay with the firm after this indiscretion, I doubt that they lost any of their other customers. And I do think that it's odd that he made the revelation to "his wife's best friend". Telling his wife I could understand, but her best friend, not even his?
It could have been just a faux pas on his behalf, or it could have been a deliberate slip just to see how long it took for the word to spread and increase the sales with the law suit being merely pro forma. Just because we might think that she thinks she doesn't need more money doesn't mean that she actually thinks that.  |
Ahh, I thought you were serious.
I think J. K. Rowling must be a very nice person. She could have squashed them all like bugs I am sure. The woman does appear to have the money to do so , and could have made more by simply keeping the settlement and/or suing.
If she had wanted publicity she was in a perfect position to get more by making a far bigger splash in the news.
Personally I think she handled the whole situation with more manners and grace than most people would have.
And I don't care for Harry Potter either. And since my sister and many of my friends do I have tried on occasion to read/watch. Not my cup of tea I guess.
Helen