View Single Post
Old 01-02-2014, 12:55 PM   #87
latepaul
Wizard
latepaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.latepaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.latepaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.latepaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.latepaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.latepaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.latepaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.latepaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.latepaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.latepaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.latepaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
latepaul's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,270
Karma: 10468300
Join Date: Dec 2011
Device: a variety (mostly kindles and kobos)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Maltby View Post
Zero sum thinking, such as you are expressing, negates the idea of creation. "What you take I lose", and other redistributionist concepts make no sense in the context of copyright or patent. The many have no right to forcibly take the fruits of any individual's labor.
The irony of this phrasing, as with the earlier comment it echoes, is that the individual who wants to exercise their right of copyright is essentially asking the many in the form of the state to use force to get others to comply to artificial restrictions. In a world without copyright it takes little or no force to copy the expression of an idea, but it does take force to stop people doing so.

Therefore it's entirely appropriate for the many to ask what, in exchange for the use of its collective might, they should get in return.
latepaul is offline   Reply With Quote