View Single Post
Old 01-02-2014, 11:00 AM   #1
unboggling
Wizard
unboggling ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.unboggling ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.unboggling ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.unboggling ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.unboggling ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.unboggling ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.unboggling ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.unboggling ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.unboggling ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.unboggling ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.unboggling ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,065
Karma: 858115
Join Date: Jan 2011
Device: Kobo Clara, Kindle Paperwhite 10
Searching for format- format vs formats vs approximate formats?

I've tested these searches and can't notice a difference in speed of results. Maybe my library isn't large enough for the difference to be significant yet. Which would be the fastest search for epub format in a very large library?

  1. format:epub
  2. formats:epub
  3. #formats2:epub

    Note: #formats2 is composite column with template {:'approximate_formats()'}

Do #1 and #2 look at the files in the book folders?

Is #3 faster because it doesn't, even though it's composite column?

Is format or formats indexed?

What's the difference between format and formats?

Last edited by unboggling; 01-02-2014 at 11:14 AM.
unboggling is offline   Reply With Quote