Thread: Sherlock Holmes ruled to be (mostly) in the public domain
View Single Post
Old 12-30-2013, 12:18 AM   #23
tubemonkey
monkey on the fringe
tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
tubemonkey's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,782
Karma: 158733736
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Seattle Metro
Device: Moto E6, Echo Show
Quote:
Originally Posted by bug_me_not View Post
But... why?
Because these works are property, and I don't believe in placing time limits on property ownership. It's that simple. I don't care if it's the family farm, Mickey Mouse, your home, or the latest Dan Brown novel. I make no distinction between tangible and intangible property.
tubemonkey is offline   Reply With Quote