View Single Post
Old 12-29-2013, 08:09 AM   #11
pdurrant
The Grand Mouse 高貴的老鼠
pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
pdurrant's Avatar
 
Posts: 74,082
Karma: 315558332
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norfolk, England
Device: Kindle Oasis
Quote:
Originally Posted by fjtorres View Post
That is what he is saying.
Thanks - I clearly misunderstood his post. Whoops.

Quote:
Originally Posted by fjtorres View Post
However, the ruling has a caveat that isn't being broadly reported: the estate holds certain trademarks they can still collect on.
I don't think the question of whether trademark trumps copyright has come to court. That is, whether it's legal to write a story about a character where the original stories involving the character are public domain, but the character's name is a trademark.
Since trademarks are very restricted in scope, I hope it wouldn't be possible to prevent publication by trademarking a name.
pdurrant is offline   Reply With Quote