MobileRead Forums - View Single Post

theducks · 12-19-2013, 02:57 PM

Bujold was negligent. Period.
Baen CD's were nothing NEW. The same re-distribution rules existed from the time of CD #1.
She clearly did not do her homework. What is more surprising: Her lack of knowledge about one of her normal publisher and their marketing policy.

Any take down notice would have to come from Baen as it was their CD being distributed, not Bujolds. Baen had the copyrights to the CD.

12-19-2013, 02:57 PM	#62
theducks Well trained by Cats Posts: 31,141 Karma: 60406498 Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: The Central Coast of California Device: Kobo Libra2,Kobo Aura2v1, K4NT(Fixed: New Bat.), Galaxy Tab A	Bujold was negligent. Period. Baen CD's were nothing NEW. The same re-distribution rules existed from the time of CD #1. She clearly did not do her homework. What is more surprising: Her lack of knowledge about one of her normal publisher and their marketing policy. Any take down notice would have to come from Baen as it was their CD being distributed, not Bujolds. Baen had the copyrights to the CD.