View Single Post
Old 12-18-2013, 03:19 PM   #11
w1k0
Banned
w1k0 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.w1k0 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.w1k0 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.w1k0 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.w1k0 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.w1k0 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.w1k0 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.w1k0 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.w1k0 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.w1k0 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.w1k0 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 48
Karma: 447520
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Poland
Device: Kindle Touch, Kindle Paperwhite 2
This is not the right thread to discuss the art of war so I hope that this off-topic topic will disappear as soon as possible. So I am asking doubleshuffle, pynch, and the other debaters to stay on topic.

***

Quote:
Originally Posted by pynch View Post
Would you care to elaborate why you think that “camping” could be condescending to gays? I have never come across the term in that context.
Collins Dictionary:

Quote:
2 camp (kæmp) (informal)

adjective
  • effeminate; affected in mannerisms, dress, etc
  • homosexual
  • consciously artificial, exaggerated, vulgar, or mannered; self-parodying, esp when in dubious taste
verb
  • (transitive) to perform or invest with a camp quality
  • See camp it up
noun
  • a camp quality, style, etc
The keywords: “exaggerated”, “effeminate”, and “homosexual” appear in different dictionaries in the context of the definition of “camp”. I assumed that “camping” is an action involving a homosexual activity or behavior.

doubleshuffle could post two words:

Quote:
Harold Camping
but he decided to post just one:

Quote:
Camping.
I assume that it was an intentional action. He guarded the rear with the help of Harold Camping and posted a vague comment.

Our “Posting Guidelines” say:

Quote:
Do attempt to state your point of view in a way that avoids misunderstanding. Remember that we are an international community and not all members are posting in their first language.
doubleshuffle violated that rule.

***

Quote:
Originally Posted by pynch View Post
BTW, “the author of the quoted post” has a name which you can easily find above his avatar—so you might as well use it.
I am aware that the “the author of the quoted post” has a name – doubleshuffle.

I used circumlocution (also called “circumduction”, “circumvolution”, “periphrasis”, or “ambage”) intentionally. I had a few reasons. One of them follows our “Posting Guidelines”:

Quote:
Name calling is not permitted, even in the form of a question, e.g. “X’s posts make me wonder how much he believes what he’s saying, or if he’s just a troll.”
So I did not name doubleshuffle in my entire post #6 except for the quotation. As I see you were able to infer my other motive. I am satisfied.

***

doubleshuffle, pynch, and me: we used our skills in martial art to harden this debate a bit. I hope that this post ends the off-topic discussion here.
w1k0 is offline