Quote:
Originally Posted by Divingduck
Kovid,
I have some unknown property names in CSS when I do a check for:
|
I had also noticed it. But I think that implementing ALL the possible and personalized properties the whole world can have will be completely impossible. I suppose Kovid can only implement checks for the "standard" ones. A small price for so great tool.
Quote:
Originally Posted by arspr
- I know that you are going to ignore entities like which is probably the best thing to do. But nevertheless, why generates a warning/error but, as example, — or ² don't? Irrelevant? Or the symptom of another possible hidden issue?
|
Kovid, this issue is still present. I attach a screenshot ("Ignored entities.jpg") with some example entities in the beginning of line 20. No warning about them, but I get the warning with
. Intended? In that case, why is there a distinction between
and other ones?
Quote:
Originally Posted by kovidgoyal
1) Check Book now checks CSS as well, in stylesheets and inside <style> tags
|
Don't kill me, please
You forgot about styles inside tags... I attach a screenshot ("You forgot CSS inside tags....jpg") of a real book where I have deleted a ";" in the middle of it. (Line 12 between "center" and "background-color").
And then even another suggestion request (no real hurry about it). The next screenshot ("CSS Warning Texts.jpg") shows errors because of deleted ";" (lines 3 and 10) and a deleted "}" (line 19). I really, but really really, think that the error texts are completely
UNfriendly. If you could somehow "translate" them to common world information, it would be really welcomed.
EDITED ----
And another possible issue. Please check "Before.jpg" and "After.jpg" (a Beautify action). I've deleted the ending </i> in line 15. When Beautify (or Fix HTML) is launched an extra pair of "<i> </i>" appears outside the paragraph (lines 17 - 21).