View Single Post
Old 12-10-2013, 04:38 PM   #65
Sil_liS
Wizard
Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 4,896
Karma: 33602910
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: PocketBook 903 & 360+
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prestidigitweeze View Post
I considered that an initial misstep before pwalker pursued what I thought was a more interesting line of attack, which focused on the judge's history of rulings and possible reasons for going after larger companies, and what the ruling's precedent might mean for companies other than Apple.
Where did pwalker focus on the judge's history of rulings and possible reasons for going after larger companies?
Sil_liS is offline   Reply With Quote