MobileRead Forums - View Single Post - Aura HD going from fw 2.8.1 to 3.1--worth it?

Haesslich · 12-09-2013, 11:49 PM

Either 2.10 or 3.10 work well for PDF files, in my experience - 2.8.1 wouldn't account for the unremovable footer when scaling pages, so you'd always loose part of a page. 2.10 and 3.10 do.

I haven't had the issues Robert J Sawyer has seen, not the wifi issues that plagued my Aura HD on 2.6 and 2.8.1. But I don't use the Kobo Nickel font either, where many people report problems with formatting.

12-09-2013, 11:49 PM	#6
Haesslich Fanatic Posts: 572 Karma: 1138182 Join Date: Sep 2009 Device: Kobo Touch,Glo,Mini,Aura/HD/One,H20, Sony PRS-300/600, Kindle 3-PW	Either 2.10 or 3.10 work well for PDF files, in my experience - 2.8.1 wouldn't account for the unremovable footer when scaling pages, so you'd always loose part of a page. 2.10 and 3.10 do. I haven't had the issues Robert J Sawyer has seen, not the wifi issues that plagued my Aura HD on 2.6 and 2.8.1. But I don't use the Kobo Nickel font either, where many people report problems with formatting.