Quote:
Originally Posted by pwalker8
Well, for one thing, I would like to see the case evolve beyond one judge's opinion sans jury.
There is a lot more to this story than some are willing to admit. Here is a story from CNN
http://features.blogs.fortune.cnn.co.../?iid=HP_River
Apparently appointing a monitor at all in a case like this is a very unusual act, as is appointing a monitor who has the close personal ties that this person seems to have with Judge Cote. It sure seems a lot like Bromwich is trying to rack up as many hours as he can before the appeal hearings come to pass. |
It's a very unusual case, perhaps none like it so I think you are simply wrong about the monitor appointment being unusual.
P.S. according to the url its a blog post....
According to the article the lawyer fees are not out of line so that's just smoke anyway.
As I said in my initial post, more whining from Apple, we'll just have to wait and see what happens.
The piece actually amounts to nothing we don't already know, speculation on the part of the writer and a very long rehash of everything that has gone before......move along...nothing to see here....
