Quote:
Originally Posted by Ninjalawyer
I recently read Oryx and Crake, and I'm still not sure how I felt about it. On the one hand, Atwood has really great style, and the book was often fairly funny; but on the other hand, it sometimes felt like a bog-standard apocalypse/post-apocalypse story.
The best way I can explain it is when you read a genre book by an author that usually does literary fiction; it sometimes feels touristy, like the author has only absorbed the most superficial memes and tropes of the genre, and is parroting those back. In any event, I've had a hardcover version of the second book in the trilogy for awhile and will probably crack that soon.
Interestingly, there was a ballet version of Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale being performed not that long ago. I think I'll wait for the upbeat, musical version.
|
Ballet? Oh My! That actually sounds interesting though. Like "King Lear" or something.
And I'd agree with you a bit, this trilogy is not the sweeping, awe-inspiring SF that some are, but it was a darn fun read and in my case years ago when Oryx and Crake was released it got me back into reading novel-length SF which I'd pretty much given up on at that point.
I certainly wouldn't put this in the same category as Dune or Foundation or even The Handmaids Tale but it's a darn fun read, particularly I found for its near-future relevance and and a few Lulz based on current society. I rated it 4/5 at Goodreads.