View Single Post
Old 12-02-2013, 02:54 PM   #58
fjtorres
Grand Sorcerer
fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 11,732
Karma: 128354696
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 26 kly from Sgr A*
Device: T100TA,PW2,PRS-T1,KT,FireHD 8.9,K2, PB360,BeBook One,Axim51v,TC1000
Quote:
Originally Posted by pl001 View Post
Sorry, I shouldn't have used the term "flying car". What I meant were small Vertical Takoff/Landing aircraft that would largely replace cars. Flying from driveway directly to destination. A rather terrifying prospect, considering the poor skills of the average driver.
That is a solved problem.
NASA took care of it over a decade ago.

http://www.aeronautics.nasa.gov/events/chicago/hits.htm

Main problem is the General Aviation aircraft companies are only slightly less conservative, technology-wise, than corporate publishing. The biggest hardware advance they were willing to adopt from NASA' s '90's GENERAL AVIATION INITIATIVE was to move GA planes from '50's propulsion technology to '60's technology.
Which is why it is falling to outsiders to develop even flying taxis, to say nothing of the "flying car".

Last edited by fjtorres; 12-02-2013 at 03:57 PM. Reason: typo
fjtorres is offline   Reply With Quote