View Single Post
Old 11-21-2013, 10:43 AM   #13
arspr
Dead account. Bye
arspr ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.arspr ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.arspr ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.arspr ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.arspr ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.arspr ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.arspr ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.arspr ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.arspr ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.arspr ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.arspr ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 587
Karma: 668244
Join Date: Mar 2011
Device: none
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidfor View Post
Personally, to remember a place in a book, I use a bookmark or something else significant.
Sure, but how do you tell to other user where it is?


Quote:
Originally Posted by davidfor View Post
I pointed to the algorithm used for ADE page numbering. It is based on compressed files. If someone does something else, then it is just adding to the confusion.
Of course I wouldn't have "fixed" ADE numbering. I would have just adopted a "fixed" version of it in the Kobo ACCESS rendering (where they have already adopted a different system BTW). So no greater confusion, just the same one we have right now: two systems. I just think a per chapter and relative numbering method is not a good idea.


Quote:
Originally Posted by davidfor View Post
I doubt that Kobo think anything like that. I have made a couple of suggestions of reasons I think they have gone the way they have, but I don't know for sure. But, isn't it good they give you a choice? You can decide which page numbering system you like and want to use.
Yes, I can choose but it is an all-or-nothing decision. Like I said about statistics, I don't really care about page numbers. And my turning point to ACCESS is based (or not) in other prominent features.

BUT despite of that fact, I think the current page numbering adopted in ACCESS is really pointless and quite worse over all than the original RMSDK/ADE one.
arspr is offline   Reply With Quote