View Single Post
Old 10-10-2008, 01:41 AM   #29
starrigger
Jeffrey A. Carver
starrigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.starrigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.starrigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.starrigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.starrigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.starrigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.starrigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.starrigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.starrigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.starrigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.starrigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
starrigger's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,355
Karma: 1107383
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Device: Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus, Droid phone, Nook HD+
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaleDe View Post
You must have tagged your PDF using open office if the size is very much bigger. It is a poor substitute. Generally a tagged document being used in untagged mode looks and works identically if tagged with a proper tool.

Dale
I experimented with Open Office, but actually I tagged mine with Framemaker. The file is approximately double the size of the untagged. Open Office gave similar results, but its output didn't reflow on my old PDA (though tests by others reported that it worked on their newer ones).

The difference in appearance on a large screen is because I modified the source file for the tagged PDF with a font that I thought looked better on a small screen. And I took out the headers and page numbers, etc. I did have a problem with the tagged file wanting to take out vertical spacing.
starrigger is offline   Reply With Quote