Quote:
Originally Posted by QuantumIguana
Translation is considered legitimate, and so is making adaptations of public domain works. You can call it fanfiction all you want, but this isn't fanfiction. Fanfiction is derivative work based on copyrighted material without permission.
This is certainly a derivative work, but it's not under copyright, and therefore there's no need to ask permission. When people get in trouble for fanfiction, it's for copyright violation, just as if someone had tried to publish an unauthorized translation. No one gets sued for adapting public domain works.
Authorized derivative works based on copyrighted material aren't fanfiction, and this is no different. It's true there is no authorization given, but as it is public domain, no permission is needed, and indeed there isn't even anyone who could give permission.
I don't know if this will be a good book or not, but even if it isn't good, that doesn't make it fanfiction.
|
Actually, I wouldn't quite say this is correct: there is nothing at all that says fanfiction is necessarily written in universes / for works still under copyright. It's, well, derivative fiction written by fans.
There is plenty of Jane Austen or Sherlock Holmes or Shakespeare fanfiction around - non-commercial, fan-written derivative works, which are essentially not at all different from, say, Harry Potter or Twilight fanfiction, other than the originals not being under copyright any more and therefore there being no question of legitimacy.
Derivative commercial fiction for public domain material is, essentially, in all matters other than legal, fanfiction (unless, I suppose, written for pure profit by people who aren't "fans" of the original in any way).
Let's say a fan writes a derivative novel (adaptation, alternative take, "what if ...") for a Jane Austen book, and a similar derivative novel (adaptation, alternative take, "what if ...") for a J K Rowling novel - they're both fanfiction, just that in one case it's perfectly legal (regardless of whether the fan posts it online for free or uploads it on Amazon to sell) and in the other, the author may opt to protest and/or sue the fan.
Most commercial derivative fiction based on / inspired by / adapted from public domain books is more polished, of higher quality and, possibly, written with profit in mind, compared to most non-commercial derivative fiction (aka fanfiction - for public domain and non-public domain works alike), but it is still, in every way but legal standing and commercial status, fanfiction.
Basically, what I'm getting at, is that if a random fan writes a similar adaptation of, say, Sense and Sensibility (taking the characters into a modern setting but leaving the basic plot intact), and posted it on fanfiction.net, it would very much be considered fanfiction. If it's Joanna Trollope and it's written and published as part of a project with "artistic value", for profit, it's literature - but in its very essence, it's the same thing.
...
Also, on topic, I've just ordered the Trollope book. Sense and Sensibility is my favourite of Jane Austen's novels, and I'm looking forward to seeing what a successful author has done with it and how well (if at all) it works in a contemporary setting.
It's entirely possible I end up not liking it very much, but it's also possible I'll enjoy it. In either case, it won't take away from the enjoyment Austen's novel has given me over the years, just as the Sense and Sensibility fanfiction (of the non-commercial, fan-written kind) that I've read over the years, most of it admittedly not very good, didn't make me think any worse of the book.